Machine Learning

To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compression

This topic contains 0 replies, has 1 voice, and was last updated by  arXiv 1 year, 8 months ago.


  • arXiv
    5 pts

    To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compression

    Model pruning seeks to induce sparsity in a deep neural network’s various connection matrices, thereby reducing the number of nonzero-valued parameters in the model. Recent reports (Han et al., 2015; Narang et al., 2017) prune deep networks at the cost of only a marginal loss in accuracy and achieve a sizable reduction in model size. This hints at the possibility that the baseline models in these experiments are perhaps severely over-parameterized at the outset and a viable alternative for model compression might be to simply reduce the number of hidden units while maintaining the model’s dense connection structure, exposing a similar trade-off in model size and accuracy. We investigate these two distinct paths for model compression within the context of energy-efficient inference in resource-constrained environments and propose a new gradual pruning technique that is simple and straightforward to apply across a variety of models/datasets with minimal tuning and can be seamlessly incorporated within the training process. We compare the accuracy of large, but pruned models (large-sparse) and their smaller, but dense (small-dense) counterparts with identical memory footprint. Across a broad range of neural network architectures (deep CNNs, stacked LSTM, and seq2seq LSTM models), we find large-sparse models to consistently outperform small-dense models and achieve up to 10x reduction in number of non-zero parameters with minimal loss in accuracy.

    To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compression
    by Michael Zhu, Suyog Gupta
    https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.01878v1.pdf

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.