Article Menu |
Probability of the High of Geometric Brownian Motionby M.A. (Thijs) van den Berg
[edit] DescriptionThis article describes the probability distribution of the high of a geometric Brownian motion. An equation is given that calculates the probability that the high is above a certain level H within a given timeframe 0<t<T.
[edit] Equation
[edit] Example equation usageWe want to know the probability that the high of a stock in the upcoming three years is above 180. The current stock price is 100, and its volatility 30%. Current interest rates are 5%, and we assume that the stock has a yield equal to the interest rate. [edit] Parameter values
[edit] Substitution of values ...and thus
[edit] Comments
[edit] Igor Zomb said ...[edit] sitmo said ...This is the probability that the highest value of the stock during a period will be above a given level. This is indeed related to barrier options (and lookback options). --sitmo 13:23, 26 July 2007 (CEST) [edit] Gerard D. Grey said ...excellent article. as are the others I've read from this site. your numerical examples really help to illustrate the formulae. --Gerard D. Grey 02:17, 3 November 2007 (CET) [edit] Peter said ...Hi, this a very interesting contribution indeed. I think there is a typing error in the example: 0.57279 should read 0.587786. How could the equitation be modified for touching a lower boundary price? Kind Regards Peter --Peter 14:15, 11 November 2007 (CET) [edit] Sitmo said ...Peter, your right about the typo. A strange one, it doesn't look to resemble anything close. I'll fixed it soon & update the numerical. Thanks for finding this. --Admin 23:29, 26 November 2007 (CET) [edit] Yann said ...I'm really wondering how Peter spotted this ! Do you really know ln(1.8) by heart ? I would have liked to see the distribution of these probabilities for any h ! --Yann 18:40, 2 January 2008 (CET) [edit] adschai said ...Another variant of this is described in this equation http://www.sitmo.com/eq/245. I.e. the joint of high and low. However, what's the x in A and B term? Any help would be appreciated. --adschai 17:08, 29 February 2008 (CET) [edit] Admin said ...adschai, The A and the B term defined on the same page. They are intermediate results that are taken out of the main equation to make it more readable. --Admin 15:47, 12 March 2008 (CET) [edit] Ozzie said ...Err. Is Doob's (martingale) inequality another approach to arrive at the same result? --Ozzie 15:11, 20 March 2008 (CET) |

Isn't this the same as probability of hitting the Up-and-Out barrier option. Joshi's book has a nice derivation of this formula using the reflected Brownian motion
--Igor Zomb 22:55, 19 July 2007 (CEST)